EVALUATION SHEET OF PAPERS
Registered Number of Paper:
Title:
The attached paper has been presented for publication in
the Journal of the Escuela de Ingeniería
Agronómica, REVISTA
CIENTÍFICA UDO AGRÍCOLA (SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL UDO AGRÍCOLA). Would you
please, review it, and offer your recommendations for acceptance or rejection.
Your comments and suggestions will be sent to the author(s), keeping your name
in anonymity. This evaluation sheet should be filled in all its items, and it
can serve as a guide for the more general comments that must be included in
additional sheets. The suggestions regarding writing and grammar must be
included in the paper. Finally, please return a copy to the editor.
Note: If you can not make the evaluation within one month, return the
attached paper to the editor.
|
Publishable without alterations
........................................................................................... |
|
|
Publishable with minor alterations
...................................................................................... |
|
|
Publishable with major alterations ..................................................................................... |
|
|
Not publishable
................................................................................................................... |
|
|
|
Yes |
No |
|
1.-
Does the paper make a contribution to the knowledge ? |
|
|
|
2.-
Is the topic within the scope of the Journal ? |
|
|
|
3.-
Is the title concise and explicit
? |
|
|
|
4.-
Do key words describe the topic ? |
|
|
|
5.-
Is the abstract informative (especially if you read
in isolate form), Are the works importance,
methodology, results, discussion and conclusions included? |
|
|
|
6.-
Is the introduction justified by review of
literature? Are the objectives clearly defined ? |
|
|
|
7.-
Is the methodology appropriately described
? and is it susceptible of being reproducible
? |
|
|
|
8.-
Are experiments appropriately designed, and is the
statistical analysis (if any) adequate? |
|
|
|
9.-
Are results interpretation and discussion acceptable
in relation with existent information (literature)? |
|
|
|
10.-
Are conclusions justified by the results? |
|
|
|
11.-
Is the paper length adjusted to the editorial norms
(maximum 30 pages)? |
|
|
|
12.-
Can the paper be shortened without alteration of its
value? |
|
|
|
13.-
The illustrations, tables, figures, etc. |
|
|
|
a.
They are all necessary |
|
|
|
b. Duplicate information among them |
|
|
|
c.
The heading and symbols are appropriate |
|
|
|
d.
They are clear and concise |
|
|
|
14.-
Is the bibliography up to date ? |
|
|
|
15.-
Make further comments in annexed sheets and/or
within the paper |
|
|
Página diseñada por Prof. Jesús Rafael
Méndez Natera
ÍNDICE DE LA REVISTA CIENTÍFICA UDO AGRÍCOLA (REGRESO)
TABLA DE CONTENIDO DE LA REVISTA CIENTÍFICA UDO
AGRÍCOLA (REGRESO)
