Revista
Científica UDO Agrícola Volumen 12. Número
1.
Año 2011.
Páginas: 155-160
Performance
and egg quality characteristics of layers fed diets containing combinations of
brewers dried grains, jack bean and cassava root meal
Rendimiento y
características de la calidad del huevo de gallinas ponedoras alimentadas con
dietas que contienen combinaciones de granos secos de cervecería, canavalia y harina de raíces de yuca
Martins Chukwudi UCHEGBU, Udo HERBERT, Ifeanyi Princewill OGBUEWU , Chibuzo Hope NWAODU, Babington Onyemaechi ESONU and Adive Boniface Ikeli UDEDIBIE
Department of Animal Science and Technology,
Federal University of Technology, P. M. B.1526, Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria. E-mail: princiano2001@yahoo.com Corresponding author
Received: 11/16/2009 |
First reviewing ending: 09/14/2010 |
First review received: 11/22/2010 |
Accepted: 01/15/2011 |
ABSTRACT
The performance, egg quality
characteristics and feed cost of layers fed combinations of maize/sorghum-based
brewers dried grains (MSBDG), jack bean (JB) and cassava root meal (CRM) in
replacement of maize. Four treatment diets: LD1, LD2, LD3
and LD4 were formulated such that they contained maize, MSBDG, JB
and CRM in the following proportions: 50, 0, 0, 0%; 0, 10, 15, 25%; 0, 10, 20,
20% and 0, 10, 25, 15% respectively. Ninety six Shika
Brown layers were divided into 4 treatment groups of 24 birds each and each
group subdivided into 3 replicates of 8 birds. The birds were randomly assigned
to the diets in a completely randomized design experiment. Nine eggs were
selected from each treatment group on the last day of the 4th, 8th,
12th and 16th week for egg quality analysis. The egg
weight of LD2 birds was significantly (p<0.05) higher than that
of LD3 birds. The birds on LD1 had superior feed
conversion ratio value which was significantly (p<0.05) lower than those of
LD2 and LD3 birds. The Haugh
unit for LD1 and LD2 birds were
significantly (p<0.05) higher than that of LD3. The shell
thickness value for LD1 birds differed significantly (p<0.05)
with that of LD4 birds. All the other parameters measured were
similar among the groups. In terms of feed cost required to produce 1kg egg,
MSBDG/JB/CRM diets were cheaper, being 6.27%, 5.59% and 14.42% lower than the
cost of feed required to produce 1kg egg for LD1 diet.
Key words: Laying birds, feedstuffs, egg,
performance
RESUMEN
El rendimiento,
las características de la calidad del huevo y costos de alimentación de
ponedoras alimentadas con combinaciones de granos secos de cervecería basados
en maíz/sorgo (GSCMS), Canavalia ensiformis L. (CE) y harina de raíces de yuca (HRY) en reemplazo
de maíz. Cuatro dietas de tratamiento: LD1, LD2, LD3
y LD4 se formularon de tal manera que contenían maíz, GSCMS, CE y
HRY en las siguientes proporciones: 50, 0, 0, 0%, 0, 10, 15, 25%; 0, 10, 20,
20% y 0, 10, 25, 15%, respectivamente. Noventa y seis ponedoras Shika Brown se dividieron en 4 grupos de tratamiento de 24
aves cada uno y cada grupo subdividido en 3 repeticiones de 8 aves. Las aves
fueron asignadas al azar a las dietas en un experimento de diseño completamente
al azar. Nueve huevos se seleccionaron de cada grupo de tratamiento en el
último día de la 4ta, 8va, 12va y 16va
semana para el análisis de la calidad del huevo. El peso de los huevos de las
aves del tratamiento LD2 fue significativamente (p < 0,05) mayor
que el de las aves del tratamiento LD3. Las aves en LD1
tuvieron un mayor valor de la relación de conversión del alimento, la cual fue
significativamente (p < 0,05) menor
que aquellas de las aves de LD2 y LD3. La unidad Haugh para la aves de LD1 y LD2 fue
significativamente (p < 0,05) mayor que aquella de LD3. El valor
del grosor de la concha de la aves de LD1
difirieron significativamente (p < 0,05) con aquella de la saves de LD4. Todos
los demás parámetros medidos fueron similares entre los grupos. En términos de
costos del alimento necesario para producir 1 kg de huevo, las dietas con
GSCMS/CE/HRY fueron más baratas, siendo 6,27, 5,59 y 14,42% menores que el
costo del alimento necesario para producir 1 kg de huevo para la dieta LD1.
Palabras clave: Aves ponedoras, alimento concentrado,
huevo, rendimiento
INTRODUCTION
As human population continues to
grow, there is need to ensure food safety for all, especially the more
susceptible sector of human population. There is increasing need for land, for
development of new neighbourhood, industries,
recreational parks and other facilities. The consequence of this is a gaping
need for food of both plant and animal origin, thereby increasing the cost of
food and feedstuffs, hence driving food out of reach of most people (Adeola and Olukosi, 2009).
There is therefore need to reduce
the competition between man and livestock for the same feedstuffs by turning to
unconventional feedstuffs in the short run while plant breeders work towards
obtaining high yielding varieties of crop which will ensure adequate surplus
and quality feed for livestock (Uchegbu, 2005). It
had earlier been reported that future expansion and sustenance of poultry
industry depend on availability of grains above that required for human
consumption (Patrick and Schaible, 1980).
Most poultry feeds are cereal-based,
as cereals often comprise between 50-75% of the diet. These cereals supply a
high proportion of starch which provides the dietary energy. Cereal grains
(e.g. maize, sorghum, wheat and barley) contribute most of the carbohydrates to
poultry diets. The majority of carbohydrates of cereal grains occur as starch,
which is readily digested by poultry (Moran, 1985). Other carbohydrates which
occur in varying concentrations in cereal grains and protein supplements
include polysaccharides and oligosaccharides all of which are poorly digested
by poultry. It has been reported that the pentosans
and beta glucans of some cereals increase the
viscosity of digesta, and therefore interferes with
nutrient utilization by poultry (Wagner and Thomas, 1978; Antoniou and
Marquardt, 1981; Bedford et al.,
1981). The question now is how to simulate the cereal component of the diet
(maize) with unconventional feed ingredients using maize/sorghum based brewers
dried grains, jack bean and cassava root meal bearing in mind their
peculiarities (Uchegbu 1995; Udedibie,
1990; Aduku, 1993; Ogbonna,
1991; Udedibie et
al., 2004).
The objectives of this study were to
assess the performance and egg quality values of laying hens fed combinations
of brewers dried grains, jackbean and cassava root
meal as the major dietary energy sources and to investigate the feed cost
implications of these combinations in layer production.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Experimental
location
This research was carried out in the
poultry unit of the Teaching and Research Farm of the Department of Animal
Science and Technology, Federal University of Technology, Owerri,
Imo State. Imo state (4o4' - 6o3' N, 6o15' - 8o15'
E) is situated in south-eastern agro-ecological zone of Nigeria. The mean
annual rainfall, temperature range and humidity range of the area were
Sources
and processing of test ingredients
The Consolidated Breweries Plc, Awo-omamma, Imo State, the
brewers of ‘33’ Export Larger Beer, was where the maize/sorghum-based brewers’
grains used for this experiment was obtained. The wet grains were sun-dried for
5 days and then run through hammer mill to break its lumps before use in the
ration formulation. Proximate analysis of maize/sorghum-based brewers’ dried
grains was conducted using standard methods (A.O.A.C., 1995) to determine its
content of crude protein, crude fibre, ether extract,
total ash and nitrogen free extract.
The jackbean
which was grown in Jos, Plateau state, Nigeria, was cracked and soaked in water
for 2 days, boiled for 1 hour and then sundried and milled before use in ration
formulation. The cassava tubers used for this experiment were produced at Mgbirichi, Imo State, Nigeria. Whole fresh cassava tubers
were cut into small slices of about 0.1-0.2cm and then spread on a platform
under the sun to dry within 5 days. The dried cassava chips were then milled to
produce the cassava root meal (CRM). Proximate analysis of the cassava was also
conducted (A.O.A.C., 1995).
Experimental
Diets
Four experimental diets were
prepared in a way that Diet 1 (LD1) (the control) contained no
maize/sorghum-based brewers’ dried grains, jackbean
and cassava root meal. Diet 2 (LD2), Diet 3 (LD3) and
Diet 4 (LD4) contained varying combinations of MSBDG,
jackbean and CRM which completely replaced maize.
Other ingredients were included at the same level for the four experimental
diets namely LD1, LD2, LD3 and LD4.
The ingredient composition of the experimental diets is shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Ingredient composition of
Shika Brown layer experimental diets (g/100g diet). |
||||
Ingredient |
Diets (%
inclusion levels of test ingredients) |
|||
T1 |
T2 |
T3 |
T4 |
|
White maize |
50.00 |
|
|
|
MSBDG † |
- |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
Jackbean |
- |
15.00 |
20.00 |
25.00 |
Cassava root meal |
- |
25.00 |
20.00 |
15.00 |
Alchornea leaf meal |
7.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
Bone meal |
4.00 |
7.00 |
7.00 |
7.00 |
Calculated nutrient analysis (%) |
|
|
|
|
Crude protein |
17.65 |
19.37 |
20.33 |
21.29 |
Crude fibre |
4.42 |
6.26 |
6.51 |
6.77 |
Ether extract |
3.78 |
2.88 |
2.95 |
3.02 |
Calcium |
4.19 |
4.27 |
4.26 |
4.26 |
Phosphorus |
1.65 |
1.70 |
1.73 |
1.75 |
Metabolizable energy (Kcal/Kg) |
2600.26 |
2241.71 |
2241.71 |
2514.88 |
†
MSBDG: Maize/sorghum-based brewers dried grains Each
data contained 15% soybean meal, 12% wheat offal, 5% palm kernel cake, 2% fish
meal, 2% blood meal, 4% bone meal, 0.25% methionine, 0.25% lysine, 0.25%
vitamin/mineral premix, 0.25% common salt. Vitamin/mineral premix contributed
the following per kg of feed: vitamin A, 10,000,000 I.U.; vitamin D3,
2,000,000 I.U.; vitamin E, 16.0g; vitamin K, 1.0g; vitamin B1,
0.509 mg; Riboflavin, 2-4 mg;
pyridoxine, 0.35 mg; niacin, 3.5 mg; biotin, 0.005 mg; choline chloride 30.0
mg; folic acid 0.1 mg; vitamin B12, 0.002 mg; vitamin C, 2.50 mg;
manganese, 10.0 mg; zinc, 4.5 mg; Copper 0.20 mg; iron 5.0 mg; methionine 2.0
mg; calcium panthothenate 1.0 mg; antioxidant
120,000 mg; selenium, 120mg. |
Experimental
birds and design
Ninety six (96) Shika
Brown layers which were in the 3rd month of laying life (i.e. 8 months
old) were randomly divided into four treatment groups of 24 birds each. Each
treatment group was further subdivided into 3 replicates of 8 birds. Birds were
housed in a 2m x 2m compartment of cemented floor, covered with wood shavings
as litter material. The design was a completely randomized design (CRD). Feed
and water were provided ad libitum. Routine vaccination and
necessary medication were administered to keep the birds healthy. The feeding
trial lasted 16 weeks.
Data
collection
The birds were weighed at the
beginning and end of the trial. Eggs were collected twice daily, morning and
evening. All the eggs collected during the period of the experiment were
weighed. Feed intake was determined by obtaining the difference between the
quantity of feed offered and the quantity of feed remaining in the morning of
the following day.
Egg
quality characteristics
Nine eggs from each experimental
group (3 eggs per replicate) were collected on the last day of the 4th,
8th, 12th and 16th week of the experimental
period for egg quality characteristics analysis. The quality parameters
investigated include Haugh unit, yolk index, albumen
index, shell thickness and yolk colour. The eggs were
weighed after collection and average weight of each group determined.
Data
analysis
Data collected on hen-day
production, average feed intake and feed conversion ratio were subjected to
one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and where significant treatment effects
were detected, Duncan’s Multiple Range Test as outlined by Steel and Torrie (1980) was used to compare the treatment means.
Similarly, data on egg quality
characteristics (Haugh unit, yolk index, albumen
index, shell thickness, yolk colour) for the
treatment groups were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and their means
compared using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test as outlined by Steel and Torrie (1980).
RESULTS
AND DISCUSSION
The data on the performance of the
experimental birds are shown in Table 2.
The lowest feed intake value occurred in birds fed the control diet (LD1)
and this was similar to those fed LD4. The birds on LD2
and LD3 had significantly (p<0.05) higher feed intake than those
on LD1. There was a marked inconsistency in feed intake as the
energy value of the diet decreased and the fibre
content of the diet increased. This was attributed to limitation imposed by
bulk as a result of high fibre content.
Table 2. Effect of combinations of
maize/sorghum-based brewers’ dried grains, jack bean and cassava root meal on
the production performance of Shika Brown laying
hens. |
|||||
Parameter |
LD1 |
LD2 |
LD3 |
LD4 |
SEM |
Hen day production (%) |
68.39a |
64.59ab |
56.78ab |
51.86b |
3.74 |
Body weight change (kg) |
0.37ab |
0.33a |
0.36b |
0.36ab |
0.01 |
Average egg weight (g) |
60.59ab |
61.39a |
60.40b |
61.22ab |
0.24 |
Average feed intake (g/bird/day) |
109.50b |
124.12a |
125.20a |
117.10ab |
3.64 |
Feed conversion ratio (kg feed/ kg
egg) |
1.81b |
2.02a |
2.07a |
1.91ab |
0.06 |
Mortality (absolute number) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
a,bMeans in the
same row bearing different superscripts are significantly (p<0.05)
different. SEM:
Standard error mean. |
The egg weight for LD2
birds was significantly (p<0.05) heavier than that of LD3 birds.
In all the treatments, the average sizes ranged from 60-61g, thereby tending
toward extra - large size (³ 63g) (Aduku, 1991). In Nigeria,
most commercial egg producers often emphasize more egg size as a measure of
profit at the expense of other parameters. This could partly explain the
greater emphasis by poultry breeders on the development and improvement of this
trait (egg size) in chicken (Essien, 1990).
Birds on LD1 and LD4
diets recorded the best feed conversion ratio of 1.81 and 1.91 respectively,
the values of which were not significantly (p>0.05) different. The birds on
LD2 and LD3 diets had significantly higher (p<0.05)
feed conversion ratios relative to LD1 birds.
LD3 birds gained significantly
(p<0.05) more weight per day than LD2 birds, but there was no
other significant differences among treatments in daily weight gain. It was
generally observed that all the four treatment diets favoured
body weight gain. Thus the farmer (producer) would gain from the sale of his
spent layers (old layers) as their selling prices were usually based on their
live weight.
Hen day egg production for LD1 was
significantly (p<0.05) higher than that for LD4 birds. LD2
and LD3 birds had similar (p>0.05) hen-day production, which
compared favourably with that of LD1 and
LD4. There was no mortality among the treatment birds throughout the
4 month duration of the experiment. The zero mortality suggests that the
various combinations of MSBDG/Jackbean/CRM
produced products that were not deleterious to the health of the laying hens.
The effect of combinations of MSBDG, Jackbean and cassava root
meal on egg quality characteristics of laying hens is presented in Table 3.
Eggs from LD1 and LD2 birds had significantly (p<0.05)
higher Haugh unit score than those from LD3
birds which compared favourably with those from LD4.
The Haugh unit values recorded for the four treatment
groups were within the range of freshly-laid eggs (Essien
1990). Haugh units of 72 and above are indications of
freshness in eggs – an index of ability of albumen to remain viscous.
Table 3. Egg quality parameters of Shika
Brown laying hens fed combinations of maize/sorghum-based brewers’ dried
grains, jack bean and cassava root meal. |
|||||
Egg quality parameters |
LD1 |
LD2 |
LD3 |
LD4 |
SEM |
Haugh unit |
87.12a |
86.44a |
80.47b |
83.20ab |
1.54 |
Yolk index |
0.48a |
0.44ab |
0.41b |
0.42b |
0.02 |
Albumin index |
0.09a |
0.08a |
0.07b |
0.08ab |
0.01 |
Shell thickness (mm) |
0.37a |
0.36ab |
0.34ab |
0.33b |
0.01 |
Yolk colour |
2.60 |
2.70 |
2.90 |
2.70 |
0.06 |
a,bMeans in the
same row bearing different superscripts are significantly (p<0.05)
different; SEM-Standard error mean. |
The yolk index value of LD1
was significantly (p<0.05) higher than that of LD3 and LD4,
which were similar (p>0.05) to that of LD2. The yolk index is a
measure of the standing-up quality of the yolk; and the range of values
(0.41-0.48) observed for the four treatments were similar to that reported by Essien (1990).
The albumen index values of the eggs
from LD1 and LD2 were similar (p>0.05) and these were
significantly (p<0.05) higher than those of LD3 birds which were
similar to LD4. The albumen index values recorded here were in line
with the values in literature for fresh eggs (Essien,
1990).
The shell thickness of LD1
birds was significantly (p < 0.05) thicker than that of LD4 birds,
but there were no significant (p>0.05) differences among treatments in shell
thickness. Numerically, the shell thickness appeared to be decreasing with
increasing replacement level of cassava root meal with jackbean.
This could be linked with the high fibre content of jackbean which tends to interfere with mineral absorption.
Going by the report by Stadelma (1986), the four
treatment diets met the requirement of at least 0.33mm shell thickness if the
egg were to have more than 50% chance of moving through market handling without
breaking.
The yolk colour
values of eggs from the four treatment groups were similar (p>0.05). The
yolk colour range of 2.6 – 2.9 showed that the 2%
dietary level inclusion of alchonia leaf meal in each meal in each of the treatment
diet was not high enough to increase the yolk score, and thus had little effect
on yolk colour.
Replacement of maize with various combinations
of MSBDG/Jackbean/CRM
produced diets that were cheaper relative to the control diet. When the cost of
production was evaluated based on kg feed required to produce 1kg egg, it was
observed that LD4 was the most economical diet in terms of the cost
of feed required to produce 1kg egg. The control (LD1) group
recorded the highest cost of feed required to produce 1kg of egg. In the
various combinations of MSBDG/JB/CRM diets, it cost 6.27%; 5.59% and 14.42% for
LD2, LD3 and LD4 less to produce 1kg of egg
than it will cost the control diet (maize-based diet) (Table 4).
Table 4. Feed cost evaluation of
combinations of maize/sorghum-based brewers’ dried grains, jack bean and
cassava root meal in Shika Brown layer diets. |
||||
Economic consideration |
LD1 |
LD2 |
LD3 |
LD4 |
Kg feed / kg egg produced |
1.81 |
2.02 |
2.07 |
1.91 |
Cost of feed (US$ / Kg) † |
0.50 |
0.42 |
0.41 |
0.40 |
Cost of feed / kg egg (US$) |
2.31 |
2.44 |
2.48 |
2.31 |
Cost reduction (%) ‡ |
0.00 |
6.27 |
5.59 |
14.42 |
† Cost of feed was calculated
based on the prevailing ingredient cost. ‡ Relative to the control (LD1) |
CONCLUSION
With regard to egg quality, the trial
showed that the fresh eggs produced by each of the four treatment diets fell
within the range of normal egg sizes; the yolk index values of the eggs from
the various treatment groups were within the reported range of 0.33 – 0.50 for
fresh eggs; and their shell thickness values of ³ 0.33mm, indicating that the eggs will not crack easily
during handling / transportation.
LITERATURE
CITED
Adeola, O. and O. A. Olukosi.
2009. Opportunities and challenges in the use of alternative feedstuffs
in poultry production. Proceedings of the 3rd Nigeria International
Poultry Summit, 22-26 February 2009. Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria. p
44-54.
Aduku, A. O. 1993. Tropical feedstuff analysis iable, Department of
Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ahmadu Bello
University, Samaru, Zaria, Nigeria.
Aduku, J. O. 1991. Animal
products handling and processing in the tropics, Living Book Series
Publication, Abuja FCT, Nigeria.
Antoniou,
T. and R. R. Marquardt.
1981. Influence of rye pentosans on the growth of
chicks, Poultry Science. 60:1896
A.O.A.C. 1995. Official methods
of analysis. 15th Edition Association of
Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D. C. United States of America.
Bedford,
M. R.; H. L. Classen and G. L. Campbell. 1991. The effect of pelleting, salt
and pentosanase on the viscosity of intestinal
contents and the performance of broilers fed rye. Poultry Science 70 (7):
1571-1577.
Essien, A. I. 1990. Egg
quality traits and their relationships as affected by storage method and
duration of storage in the humid wet climate. Beitr. Trop. Landwitsch. Veterinary Medicine 28 H3: 345-353.
Moran,
E. T. 1985. Digestion and absorption of carbohydrates in fowl and events
through prenatal development. Journal of Nutrition
115: 665- 674.
Ogbonna, J. U. 1991. Studies
on the value of processed cassava peels in the nutrition of cockerel, Ph.D Thesis, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Patrick,
H. and P. J. Schaible. 1980. Poultry: Feed and Nutrition. AVI Publishing Co. Inc.
West Port Connecticut. United States of America.
Stadelma, W. J. 1986. Quality
identification of shell eggs. In: Egg science and technology, W. J. Stadelma and O. J. Colteria (eds.). 3rd Edition AVI publishing co. Inc
Westport Connecticut, p. 39-42.
Steel,
G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of
statistics. 2nd edition. McGraw Hill Book
C. Inc. New York, United States of America.
Uchegbu, M. C. 1995. Studies on the
nutritive value of maize/sorghum-based brewers dried grains for broilers. M.Sc.
Thesis. Federal University of Technology Owerri.
Nigeria.
Uchegbu, M. C. 2005. Combinations of
brewer’s grains, jackbean and cassava root meals as
major energy sources for poultry. Ph.D Thesis, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Technology
Owerri. Nigeria.
Udedibie, A. B. I. 1990. Nutritional
evaluation of jackbean (C. ensiformis) for the Nigeria poultry
industry. AMBIO 19:361-365.
Udedibie, A. B. I.; B. C. Anyaegbu; G. C. Onyechekwa and O.
C. Egbuokporo. 2004. Effect of feeding different levels of fermented and
unfermented cassava tuber meals on performance of broilers. Nigerian Journal of
Animal Production 31 (2): 211-219.
Wagner,
D. D. and O. P. Thomas.
1978. Influence of diets containing rye or pectin or the intestinal flora of
chicks. Poultry Science 57 (4): 971-975.
Página diseñada
por Prof. Jesús Rafael Méndez Natera
TABLA DE CONTENIDO DE LA REVISTA CIENTÍFICA UDO
AGRÍCOLA